Advisor / Architect Minimal Checklist (AUTO-STUB) ----------------------------------------------- - protects: Which founder goal does this protect? (pick one) - sina_workload: reduces / increases + short rationale - permission_loop: yes / no + explanation - sandbox_autonomy: yes / no + where/how (sandbox lane path) - target_to_blocker: yes / no + mitigation - canon_version: (string) - sandbox_evidence: link(s) to sandbox receipt(s) # Noetfield — RPAA-safe positioning (diligence) **Use:** Attach to bank / FRFI diligence folders. Do not paste payment-rail language on public www. --- ## What Noetfield is - **Governance execution infrastructure** — evaluates operational intent **before** regulated execution layers act. - **Shadow / enforce modes** for pilots; production pilots use documented `/api/v1/governance/*` only. ## What Noetfield is not - Not a payment service provider, custodian, or money transmitter. - Does not route funds, hold balances, or submit payment instructions. - Does not replace bank core, treasury, or partner MSB execution systems. ## Regulatory framing (Canada) - Positioned as **vendor / governance layer** adjacent to OSFI E-23 (model risk) readiness — not RPAA retail payment claims. - Pilot artifacts: policy evaluation metadata, RID lineage, immutable audit export — see [sample-audit-export.redacted.json](./sample-audit-export.redacted.json). ## Evidence endpoints | Endpoint | Purpose | |----------|---------| | `POST /api/v1/governance/evaluate` | Policy decision on intent | | `GET /api/v1/governance/audit-export` | RID-scoped compliance slice | | `GET /api/v1/governance/vendor-evidence` | E-23 starter pack metadata | ## Contact Engagement intake: [trust-brief intake](https://www.noetfield.com/trust-brief/intake/) · operations@noetfield.com